Following its mission of sustainable use of earth’s natural resources, Outotec puts an end to the dilemma. It combines the most advanced technologies for solid liquid separation, fluidized bed incineration and quantitative phosphate recovery.
Unlike fossil fuels, phosphorus can be recycled indefinitely. Plants take it up from soil. Humans and animals eat the plants, store a small fraction of phosphorus in the cells and excrete the surplus.
In biological nutrient cycles, the nutrient rich excrements were returned to soils. In industrial societies, these biological cycles have disappeared for good reasons. Humans and animals take up the whole range of chemical products that are beneficial for the individual or a specific target (e.g. medicine and hormones) but detrimental if universally dispersed. Moreover, in many areas population and animal farming became too dense for direct nutrient recycling.
Consequently, soils in regions with high livestock population have been overloaded with nutrients. Excessive nutrient loads lead to nutrient runoffs to water bodies. Eutrophication, algae bloom, depletion of oxygen and reduced biodiversity in affected lakes or coastal waters is the undesirable result of the well-intentioned direct nutrient recycling.
Whereas phosphorus overloads from animal excretion remain a massive problem in certain geographic areas, so-called point loads from wastewater treatment plants gradually abate because of stricter limitations on phosphorus effluents. As a result, most of human borne phosphorus ends up in the sewage sludge.
Globally a lot of sewage sludge is still stored in lagoons. This practice adds climate active air emissions to nutrient runoffs, if not particularly well managed. In Europe, it is not a legal option any more.
Nutrient recycling via direct application of sewage sludge on cropland aggravates the above mentioned runoff problem in areas with high livestock population. On top of that, the risk of some of the numerous chemicals that accumulate in sludge being taken up by crops and getting into the food chain cannot be excluded. As a consequence, some European countries have forbidden or strictly limited the direct application of sewage sludge as a fertilizer.
Thermal valorisation of sewage sludge by its combustion in fluidized bed incinerators is the royal road, particularly since effective air pollution control systems prevent toxic emissions from getting into the environment. This is why sludge incineration is becoming much more popular in highly industrialized societies, even if the energy yield is limited by the moisture content of the sludge.
As long as phosphorus could not be effectively recovered from the ash, policy makers had to decide between the bad and the evil. Nutrient recovery entailed the risk of contaminating the food chain and increasing eutrophication. Energy recovery entailed an irrecoverable loss of the finite element phosphorus.